Book Now
🚀 Installer Toolkit Now Live! Get our free resource kit to streamline your solar installs.
👉 Download Now

Solar Photovoltaic vs Solar Thermal: Key Differences Explained (2025 Guide)

September 10, 2025
•
5 min read

Thinking about “going solar”? Then you need to know about these two options: solar panels and solar thermal systems. Both rely on sunlight we see every day but turn it into energy in very different ways.

Understanding the difference matters because the right choice depends on what you actually need. In 2025, the technology has become more refined, and it is difficult to make a decision that isn’t as simple as “panels vs. heaters.”

In this guide, we’ll break down photovoltaic vs solar thermal so that you can get a clear comparison to help point you in the right direction. 

What is the Basic Difference Between Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Solar Thermal?

  • Solar Photovoltaic (PV): Uses solar cells to convert sunlight into electricity. The electricity can be used however you want, be it for using directly and stored in a battery or even grid.
  • Solar Thermal: Uses collectors to absorb sunlight and transfer the heat into water, air, or a working fluids for heating application.

So both are “solar panels,” but they serve different needs. If your goal is to power your household electric appliances, PV is the choice. If your main concern is hot water or heating then solar thermal is more efficient and cost-effective.

How Does Each Technology Convert Sunlight into Usable Energy?

  • Photovoltaic (PV): When sunlight hits the semiconductor cells in a solar panel, it excites the electrons and produces electric current. This current is sent through an inverter that again converts it into usable AC power for homes and businesses.
  • Solar Thermal: In this system, sunlight is used to heat a collector surface, which warms a fluid. The stored heat can then be used for domestic hot water, space heating, or even producing steam to drive turbine in power plant.

And this is how you can see the key difference between photovoltaic and solar thermal system: one directly produces electricity and the other capture heat.

What Are the Main Types and Use Cases for PV and Solar Thermal Systems?

When comparing photovoltaic vs solar thermal in 2025, it is helpful to look at the different system types and where each technology really shines. Both have grown into specialized categories with clear roles in residential, commercial, and industrial energy use.

Types of Photovoltaic Systems

  • Monocrystalline PV: Known for high efficiency and sleek black panels, these are perfect for rooftops with limited space.
  • Polycrystalline PV: A more affordable option with slightly lower efficiency but still widely used in homes and businesses.
  • Thin-Film PV: Lightweight, flexible, and adaptable—great for large surfaces or portable applications.
  • Building-Integrated PV (BIPV): Designed to blend into architecture, with solar windows, facades, and roof tiles.
  • Utility-Scale PV Farms: Massive installations powering thousands of homes with economies of scale.

These types of photovoltaic systems cover everything from a small home setup to a national grid supply.

Types of Solar Thermal Systems

  • Solar Water Heaters:

    • Flat Plate Collectors are common for domestic hot water.
    • Evacuated Tube Collectors capture more heat, making them efficient in colder climates.
  • Solar Thermal for Industrial Process Heat (IPH): Collector fields that supply hot water or steam for industries like food processing, textiles, and chemicals (as highlighted in NREL’s IPH studies).
  • Concentrated Solar Power (CSP): Large-scale systems using mirrors to focus sunlight onto a receiver, creating steam to drive turbines. Common setups include parabolic troughs and solar power towers.

Use Case Matrix

  • Domestic Hot Water: Solar water heaters are the most efficient and affordable choice.
  • Space Heating: Evacuated tube thermal collectors work well in colder climates.
  • Electricity for Buildings: PV systems are unmatched here.
  • Industrial Heat: Thermal collectors and CSP are better suited than PV.
  • Utility Power: Both large PV farms and CSP plants provide reliable bulk energy, though PV leads on cost while CSP offers built-in thermal storage.

How Do Efficiency and Performance Compare (Sunlight → Energy)?

  • Solar PV Efficiency: Most commercial PV modules today reach 15–25% conversion efficiency. Premium modules can go higher with tandem or heterojunction tech.
  • Solar Thermal Efficiency: Collectors often achieve 60–80% efficiency for converting sunlight into heat, making them more efficient in pure energy capture.

But there’s nuance:

  • PV systems are more versatile because electricity can power almost anything.
  • Solar thermal efficiency is less in cloudy conditions or when storage is limited.
  • PV is less impacted by water availability but CSP requires significant water for cooling.

Performance depends heavily on factors like temperature, irradiance, shading, and the balance of direct normal irradiance (DNI) vs global horizontal irradiance (GHI).

Which Technology is More Cost-Effective in 2025: Upfront Cost, Levelized Cost, or Maintenance?

Upfront Costs

  • Residential PV systems have dropped dramatically thanks to falling module prices. A rooftop system with an inverter and storage is within reach for many households.
  • Solar Thermal (water heating): It’s still cheaper for small-scale hot water applications.

LCOE (Levelized Cost of Energy)

  • PV LCOE in 2025: Continues to fall globally, now one of the cheapest energy sources, especially utility-scale PV.
  • Solar Thermal LCOE: Competitive only in certain contexts (large-scale CSP or direct heating).

Maintenance Profiles

  • PV: Minimal—modules are durable with 20–25 year lifespans.
  • Solar Thermal: Pumps, fluids, and moving parts may require more upkeep.

In 2025, PV is more cost-effective for multipurpose energy needs, while solar thermal is only attractive for simple heating applications.

Which Technology Performs Better for Specific Projects: Homes, Commercial Buildings, Industrial Process Heat, and Utilities?

Not every solar technology works equally well in every situation. The choice between solar PV for homes vs solar thermal depends on your end goal—electricity, hot water, or large-scale energy. Let’s break it down by project type.

Homes

For households that mainly need hot water and have limited roof space, solar thermal water heaters are often the most efficient solution. Flat-plate or evacuated tube collectors can easily handle daily hot water needs without taking up much space.

But if the priority is electricity—to run appliances, charge EVs, or interact with the grid—solar PV systems with battery storage are the better choice. PV is also more versatile because it supports both self-consumption and net metering.

Commercial Buildings

Most commercial properties consume more electricity than heat. That makes PV systems the natural fit for offices, retail outlets, and warehouses. Larger rooftops or carports can host high-capacity PV arrays.

However, in businesses like hotels, gyms, or laundries that need both electricity and hot water, hybrid PV-T (photovoltaic-thermal) systems provide a smart balance. These systems generate electricity while capturing excess heat from panels.

Industrial Process Heat

When it comes to the best solution for industrial process heat, solar thermal technologies lead. Large fields of flat-plate or evacuated tube collectors can provide hot water or steam for industries like textiles, chemicals, or food processing. 

In high-temperature processes, concentrated solar thermal systems (CSP) deliver steam at industrial scales, often more efficiently than using PV with electric boilers.

Utilities

On the utility scale, the debate often comes down to PV vs CSP for power generation. PV farms dominate globally due to their lower cost, scalability, and falling module prices. 

However, CSP plants still have a niche advantage in regions with strong Direct Normal Irradiance (DNI), since they can incorporate thermal storage to deliver power after sunset.

Environmental and Lifecycle Comparison: PV vs Solar Thermal

Are Hybrid Options (PV-T and hybrid PV + thermal systems) a Practical Choice in 2025?

In 2025, hybrid solar solutions like PV-T systems—short for photovoltaic-thermal hybrid—are getting a lot of attention. The idea is simple: instead of just generating electricity with a PV panel, you also capture the heat that would normally be wasted. 

A PV-T unit combines a solar panel on top with a thermal collector underneath. The panel makes electricity, while the collector grabs the excess heat for hot water, space heating, or even industrial use.

The big benefit? More energy from the same space. A PV-T setup can produce both power and heat, making it a smart option for rooftops with limited space—think city homes, offices, or small commercial buildings. There’s also a bonus: because the thermal collector cools the PV cells, the panels often run more efficiently than standalone PV.

That said, there are trade-offs. PV-T systems cost more upfront and are trickier to install and maintain compared to single-technology systems. Their performance also depends on climate and whether there’s a consistent need for both electricity and heat. Without good heat storage, some of that captured energy could go to waste.

Research from NREL shows that in “mixed-use” scenarios—where you need both power and moderate heat—PV-T can outperform separate systems over its lifetime. But if your project only needs electricity or only needs heat, going with just PV or solar thermal is usually more cost-effective.

PV-T is practical in 2025 if you’re tight on space or need both heat and electricity. Otherwise, simpler systems may still give you the best bang for your buck.

How Do Climate, Geography, and Solar Resource (DNI vs GHI) Influence the Choice?

When deciding between PV and solar thermal technologies, local solar resources make all the difference. Two key metrics—DNI (Direct Normal Irradiance) and GHI (Global Horizontal Irradiance)—help guide the choice.

  • DNI measures the amount of direct sunlight that reaches the Earth’s surface in a straight line. This is the kind of solar energy needed for concentrating technologies like CSP (Concentrated Solar Power) and other solar thermal collectors that rely on mirrors or lenses.

  • GHI measures the total sunlight on a flat surface, including both direct sunlight and diffuse light scattered by clouds or particles. This metric is most important for PV systems, which can efficiently convert both direct and diffuse light into electricity.

In regions with high DNI, such as deserts in the Middle East, North Africa, the American Southwest, and parts of India, CSP and concentrating thermal systems perform extremely well because they thrive on strong, direct rays. These areas are best suited for utility-scale CSP or large solar thermal plants producing electricity and industrial heat.

In areas with moderate DNI but high GHI, like much of Europe and Southeast Asia, PV systems are typically the better choice. PV panels can capture diffuse light even under hazy or cloudy conditions, making them more versatile in variable climates.

What Are the Policy, Incentives, and Permitting Differences?

One thing people often overlook when choosing between PV and solar thermal is how policies and incentives can tip the balance. In 2025, solar PV incentives tend to be more generous and wide-reaching. Things like tax credits, feed-in tariffs, and net metering make PV especially appealing, since you can lower your upfront cost and even get paid for sending extra electricity back to the grid.

For solar thermal systems, the incentives are usually more targeted. Instead of net metering, you’re more likely to see rebates for solar water heaters or support through renewable heat schemes. These programs are great if your main goal is to cut heating costs for water or space heating, but they’re often smaller in scale compared to PV benefits.

Permitting is another difference worth noting. With PV, you’ll usually deal with electrical permits and utility approvals because the system ties into your home’s wiring and, often, the grid. Solar thermal, on the other hand, leans more on plumbing and mechanical permits, since it’s about moving heat and fluids rather than electricity.

So, if you’re leaning toward PV, expect broader financial incentives but more utility paperwork. If you’re considering thermal, you might get simpler rebates but deal more with plumbing codes.

FAQ: Quick Answers About PV vs Thermal

1. Which is better for hot water?
For hot water, solar thermal systems are usually more efficient than PV. They directly capture heat from the sun, making them ideal for domestic hot water and space heating.

2. Can PV replace a solar water heater?
Yes, but not directly. PV panels generate electricity, which can then power an electric water heater. However, this is less efficient than using a dedicated solar thermal water heating system.

3. Is CSP viable for small businesses?
Not usually. Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) is designed for large-scale, high-DNI regions and requires significant land and investment. Small businesses typically benefit more from PV or smaller solar thermal setups.

4. Which is better, PV or CSP?
It depends on the project. PV is more versatile and cost-effective for homes, businesses, and cloudy regions, while CSP shines in sunny deserts for utility-scale projects.

5. What is the difference between solar thermal and solar panels?
Solar PV panels produce electricity, while solar thermal systems capture heat for water, space, or industrial uses. Both are solar-powered, but they serve different needs.

6. Is solar thermal better than PV for hot water?
Yes. If your main goal is hot water, solar thermal is more efficient and usually cheaper. PV works better when you need electricity as well as heating.

How Installers and Project Owners Can Evaluate Which System to Pick and How Arka360 Helps

If you’re trying to decide between PV and solar thermal, consider these key factors:

  • Your energy needs (electricity vs heat).
  • Available space (roof, land, or both).
  • Budget and incentives in your region.
  • Climate and solar resource profile (DNI vs GHI)

This is where Arka360 comes in. Installers and businesses can simulate site performance, run ROI comparisons, and generate customized solar proposals. This saves time and helps you make confident, data-driven decisions.

Conclusion

It is alright to be confused when choosing between solar PV and solar thermal in 2025. It all comes down to your needs. PV is the go-to choice for electricity and versatile applications, while thermal shines in direct heating tasks. Hybrid systems can deliver the best of both in certain projects.

If you’re weighing your options, Arka360 can help you design your solar panel system, visualize system performance, and present clear proposals plus also help you with ROI. With solar adoption growing, you should be choosing the best solar design software to plan the system that works best for you.

‍