Solar Design Software In-Depth Comparison: ARKA 360 vs Solargraf 2024

With solar projects growing in complexity, solar EPC/Installers are looking for digital design tools that simplify design creation, are fast, easy to use, accurately model layouts, and power generation, and enable the development of comprehensive proposals for customers. However, with multiple solar design tools and platforms available, making the right choice can be challenging for Installers.

This article helps you determine which tool best suits your design needs by providing a head-to-head comparison of two leading solar design software platforms – ARKA 360 and Solargraf. By highlighting the strengths and growth areas of each, we aim to assist you in your search for the optimal solar design software.

Overview

In this comprehensive comparison, we will explore the key features, and functionalities of ARKA 360 and Solargraf, two prominent players in the solar design software market. Through real-life use cases, we will demonstrate how each software facilitates the tasks that solar installers and design teams must complete.

Additionally, we will cover other important aspects of both software/companies that users often require to be successful, i.e. ease of use, training options available, regular updates, and customer support practices.

Software Functionality: ARKA 360 offers comprehensive lead to PTO capabilities while Solargraf focuses on project management primarily with proposal generation capability

Solar EPC and installers require solar design software that offers comprehensive functionality across several key areas: advanced design capabilities, detailed financial analysis, and robust CRM tools. These features are crucial for managing complex solar projects from inception to completion.

ARKA 360 is engineered to meet these intricate demands, offering a full suite of features that cover the entire project lifecycle—from lead generation to PTO (Permission to Operate).

1. Advanced Design Tools: ARKA 360 enables users to create precise solar panel layouts, optimize system performance, and ensure accurate, efficient system planning. The platform includes critical features such as roof merge/demerge, dormer modeling, shade analysis, solar panel layout, auto-draw smart roof functionality, and energy storage simulation. These capabilities are essential for Solar EPCs and installers who must design complex rooftop systems and ground-mounted arrays with high precision and efficiency.
2. Robust Financial Analysis: ARKA 360’s financial tools allow for detailed cost estimates, ROI calculations, and payback period evaluations, essential for financial planning and persuasive client presentations. These capabilities help solar professionals provide clients with clear, data-driven insights into the economic benefits of their solar investments.
3. Comprehensive CRM System: ARKA 360 integrates an advanced CRM system that excels in lead tracking and management. Features such as customizable dashboards, advanced sorting and filtering options, pipeline management, and task scheduling streamline workflows, boost productivity, and reduce administrative burdens. This level of customization and integration allows solar teams to maintain focus on project execution and customer satisfaction, which is vital for scaling operations and maintaining high standards of service.

In contrast, Solargraf primarily focuses on simplifying project management and proposal generation. While it offers a streamlined permitting tool that speeds up document submission and approval processes, its capabilities fall short in several critical areas:

1. Design Tools: Solargraf’s design tools, although user-friendly, are more suited to quick layout creation rather than the in-depth system optimization required for complex projects. Notably, Solargraf lacks essential features such as roof merge/demerge, dormer modeling, and support for solar trackers. These limitations can hinder Solar EPCs/installers who need to design intricate rooftop systems or optimize ground-mounted arrays, making it challenging to meet the demands of more sophisticated projects.
2. Proposal Generation: The platform’s proposal generation tool, while visually appealing, lacks the comprehensive financial analysis that ARKA 360 provides. This limits the depth of information that solar professionals can offer their clients, potentially weakening the case for solar adoption and reducing the effectiveness of client presentations.
3. CRM Functionality: Solargraf’s CRM supports basic tracking of client interactions and follow-ups, which is useful for maintaining relationships but lacks the depth and customization needed for more complex operations. This can be a significant drawback for Solar EPC/installers managing multiple, large-scale projects where detailed client management is crucial.

While Solargraf may be sufficient for smaller projects or less complex operations, it doesn’t offer the same level of integration or the advanced tools necessary for large-scale or more sophisticated solar projects compared to ARKA 360. For Solar EPCs and installers who require a comprehensive, end-to-end solution that covers all aspects of the solar project lifecycle, ARKA 360 provides a superior platform.

Financial Analysis: ARKA 360’s Comprehensive Financial Tools vs. Solargraf’s Basic Estimates

For solar EPCs and installers, detailed financial analysis is vital for assessing project viability and making compelling client presentations. Accurate cost estimations, ROI calculations, and the ability to model various financial scenarios directly impact project success.

ARKA 360 provides a robust suite of financial tools that deliver comprehensive cost estimates, ROI calculations, and payback period evaluations. It includes advanced features like incentives and tax credit integrations, allowing users to create highly customized financial models.

The platform also provides a variety of financing options such as loans, PPAs, and leases, allowing users to present customized financial plans that align with client needs. These capabilities ensure that solar professionals can deliver clear, data-driven insights, helping clients understand the full economic benefits of their solar investments.

In contrast, Solargraf offers basic financial capabilities focused on simplifying cost estimation and providing straightforward ROI calculations. While sufficient for smaller or less complex projects, Solargraf lacks the advanced customization options available in ARKA 360, limiting its effectiveness in scenarios that require detailed financial planning.

💡

Did you know? ARKA 360 offers a 360-degree view of your solar business. 🚀

Book a FREE DEMO!

Ease of Use: ARKA 360’s sleek and modern interface can handle complex designs but needs some learning. Solargraf is easy for simple projects but limiting for complex ones

For solar EPCs and installers, ease of use is crucial in selecting solar design software. Efficiency in project management, intuitive interfaces, and streamlined workflows directly impact productivity and accuracy on the job. Ability to handle large complex projects and make quick changes in the same is important.

User Interface Comparison

ARKA 360 offers a modern, sleek design that enhances productivity for serious design work. It is tailored for users who require precision and depth in their projects, allowing for seamless navigation through complex tasks. On the other hand, Solargraf's basic drag-and-drop interface works well for beginners but is limiting for more complex projects. This limitation can hinder productivity when scaling up to more detailed or large-scale designs.

Learning Curve

ARKA 360 is designed with solar EPC/installers in mind, providing an intuitive yet powerful interface that guides users through intricate tasks efficiently. This design makes ARKA 360 ideal for users who need accuracy and control over their projects. Solargraf, in contrast, features a drag-and-drop interface that is more accessible for beginners. While visually appealing and easy to learn, it lacks the depth needed for handling more complex solar design tasks, making it less suitable for advanced users.

Customization and Workflow Flexibility

ARKA 360 excels in customization, allowing users to tailor workflows and outputs to fit specific project needs, making it ideal for both large-scale commercial projects and residential installations. This level of flexibility is important for solar professionals who require bespoke solutions. Solargraf, while offering some customization, focuses on streamlined, standardized workflows. This approach is great for delivering consistent results quickly but may not provide the same level of flexibility and control as ARKA 360, especially for more complex projects.

Training and Support: Arka360 offers near 24x7 support and deep learning/training resources while Solargraf offers basic training focused on accessibility

Effective training and robust support are essential for solar EPCs and installers to maximize the benefits of their design software. Comprehensive training resources and responsive customer support can significantly ease the onboarding process and address any challenges that arise.

ARKA 360 goes above and beyond in this regard, offering an extensive array of training materials tailored to users at all skill levels. The platform provides in-depth tutorials, regularly scheduled webinars, and detailed blog guides that are easy to understand and implement.

These resources ensure that both beginners and advanced designers can effectively utilize the software's powerful features. Moreover, ARKA 360’s training content is regularly updated to reflect the latest industry trends and software enhancements, helping users stay ahead in a rapidly evolving market.

On the other hand, Solargraf offers basic training resources that focus on accessibility. The platform includes video tutorials, guides, and demos that facilitate straightforward onboarding. While Solargraf’s intuitive design may require less training, the depth and breadth of its training materials do not match ARKA 360’s offerings.

Regular Updates and Customer Support Practices: Arka360 is investing heavily in its R&D and engineering and regularly publishes updates based on customer feedback. Solargraf updates focus on its project management capability.

ARKA 360 stands out for its commitment to regular updates, consistently enhancing its comprehensive suite of design and financial analysis tools. These frequent updates ensure that users always have access to the latest features and technological advancements, keeping the platform in line with evolving industry standards. This proactive approach improves user experience and ensures that ARKA 360 remains at the forefront of innovation in the solar design software market.

In addition to its robust update cycle, ARKA 360 excels in customer support. The platform offers multiple support channels, including phone, email, and dedicated support teams that are highly responsive and knowledgeable. This combination of frequent updates and strong support infrastructure ensures that users can continuously optimize their use of the platform and stay ahead in their projects.

In contrast, Solargraf’s updates are primarily focused on refining its project management capabilities, particularly in areas like permitting and proposal generation. While these updates are regular, they tend to improve specific core functionalities rather than expand the overall feature set.

This narrow focus can enhance efficiency in isolated tasks but may ultimately hinder Solar EPCs and installers who require a more comprehensive suite of tools to manage complex projects.

When it comes to customer support, Solargraf provides responsive options such as live chat and phone support, which are designed to offer real-time assistance. While these options are useful, they do not match the breadth and depth of ARKA 360’s support ecosystem.

Comparison Table: ARKA 360 vs Solargarf

What Sets ARKA 360 Apart

ARKA 360 distinguishes itself in the competitive solar design software market through several standout features tailored to meet the complex needs of solar EPCs and installers.

Comprehensive CRM Dashboard: ARKA 360 includes an integrated CRM dashboard that streamlines customer management, project tracking, and lead generation. This feature centralizes client interactions and project information, enhancing workflow efficiency and ensuring that all customer data is accessible and actionable.

Advanced Design Tools: The platform offers a suite of advanced design tools that facilitate precise and detailed solar system planning. Features such as 3D model export, API integration, and advanced shading analysis enable users to create accurate, high-quality designs that optimize system performance and efficiency.

Proposal, Permit, and Contracts: ARKA 360 simplifies the administrative aspects of solar projects with built-in tools for generating proposals, permits, and contracts. This functionality reduces the administrative burden and accelerates the approval process, helping users to focus on delivering high-quality installations.

User-Friendly Interface: Despite its advanced features, ARKA 360 maintains a user-friendly interface that ensures ease of use. Its intuitive design helps users navigate complex functionalities with ease, reducing the learning curve and enhancing overall productivity.

Cost-Effective: While ARKA 360 offers advanced capabilities, it is priced competitively, providing significant value for the cost. The tiered pricing structure allows users to choose a plan that matches their needs, from essential tools in the Basic Plan to comprehensive features in the Premium and Enterprise Plans, making it a cost-effective choice for various business sizes and requirements.

Conclusion

ARKA 360 is a premier new-generation solar design software platform that leads to PTO management. It offers cutting-edge tools tailored for even the most complex solar projects. In a field where precision and efficiency are key, ARKA 360 empowers professionals and companies to achieve exceptional results in solar design.

In comparison, Solargraf is an older software that works well for simpler projects but lacks the modern UI, integrated end-to-end capability, and complex project handling that EPC/Installers need today.